Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R9 260 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 260 OEM +55%
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Bonaire XT (215-0839039)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy