AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1.894 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+321%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Mar 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
16
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Pitcairn PRO
(215-0828062)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.0
