CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon R9 270X
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270X and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 270X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 180W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 270X
+700%
2.688 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270X
VS
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
112
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
84.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
168.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Curacao
GPU Name
G92
Curacao XT (215-0848004)
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
180W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
2
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs Intel Arc A780
3
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
5
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD Radeon RX 550X
6
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
7
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
8
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
9
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
10
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy