Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FirePro S7000

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD FirePro S7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +37%
3.344 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
20
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy