Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon HD 6230

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon HD 6230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +3115%
3.344 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6230
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jul 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.67GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
80
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
19W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Park
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Park S3 LP
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy