Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 177% (2580MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600 +176%
9.247 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jun 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 23
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy