Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 119% (2040MHz vs 933MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +212%
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Dec 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
205W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Navi 10
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy