Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1000MHz vs 933MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +22%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
950 MHz
933 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
32
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
375W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy