AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1968 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X
+5020%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
80
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Cedar
Tahiti XTL
(215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
