Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro V4800

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1648 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +560%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
5
2048
Shading Units
400
128
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Redwood
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
69W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy