Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD FirePro W9100

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +27%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Mar 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
44
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
275W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy