Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 465 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 102.7GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X +379%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 465
0.855 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.7GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
11
2048
Shading Units
352
128
TMUs
44
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.38 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
855.4 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
106.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
200W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF100
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
GF100-030-A3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy