CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD FirePro S9150
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD FirePro S9150
VS
AMD Radeon R9 280X2
AMD FirePro S9150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (235W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
+23%
5.069 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2
VS
FirePro S9150
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
235W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870
3
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce G210 OEM
4
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
5
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
6
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000
7
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI FireGL V7600
8
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2
9
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
10
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy