Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD FireStream 9270

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +241%
4.096 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
800
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
160W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy