Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +451%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 635 OEM
0.743 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.736 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.94 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
742.7 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.94 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
35W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK208
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy