Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +581%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
0.601 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GF116
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
106W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy