Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +886%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
182W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT200B
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy