Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1098MHz vs 1000MHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2 +94%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
960
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GK106
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy