Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +100%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
-
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
175W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Fiji
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy