Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1546MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (295W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 64 +209%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
64
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.33 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Vega 10
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
295W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy