Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 280X2 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 118% (2175MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280X2
4.096 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +552%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

950 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
48
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
AD104
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
130W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
3x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy