Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (190W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +3%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Mar 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Orthrus
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy