Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +7211%
3.29 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Nov 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GT218
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy