Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
1784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +14854%
3.29 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Dec 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1792
Shading Units
8
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
G98
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
G98-400-U2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy