Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1072MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +33%
3.29 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 X2
2.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Nov 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1152
112
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GK104
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy