Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1072 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (86W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +226%
3.29 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5750
1.008 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Oct 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
9
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
720
112
TMUs
36
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1008 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
86W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Juniper
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Juniper LE (215-0754009)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy