Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Radeon X1600

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Radeon X1600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 190W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jan 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
27W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV516
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy