Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +7733%
3.29 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jun 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
40
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV610
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy