Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 200W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
-
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV380
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy