Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X +12725%
4.104 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
2
2048
Shading Units
40
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV620
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy