Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD FirePro S9170

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X
4.104 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +27%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
44
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy