Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD FirePro W2100

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Boost Clock680MHz
Lower TDP (26W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X +843%
4.104 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
5
2048
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Oland
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
26W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy