Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 DVI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5000 DVI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X +223%
4.104 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000 DVI
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy