Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FireGL V3600

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2440 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +3267%
4.849 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jun 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
120
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
73W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV630
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy