Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jan 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
-
160
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV516
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy