Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +689%
4.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cayman
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy