CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
VS
AMD Radeon R9 290
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 335W)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290
4.849 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+387%
23.65 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 290
3681
Radeon RX 6950 XT
+482%
21448
Radeon R9 290
VS
Radeon RX 6950 XT
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
40
Compute Units
80
2560
Shading Units
5120
160
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 21
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
275W
TDP
335W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon HD 7510 OEM
2
AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
3
AMD Radeon RX 580 vs AMD Radeon R9 290
4
AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon RX 480
5
AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
6
AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
7
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon R9 290
8
AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon R9 285X
9
AMD Radeon R9 290 vs Intel H3C XG310
10
AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon HD 7790
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy