Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FirePro V7800

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +140%
4.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
40
Compute Units
18
2560
Shading Units
1440
160
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cypress
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy