Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FirePro V8800

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +83%
4.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
1600
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
208W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cypress
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy