Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +531%
4.849 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
40
Compute Units
8
2560
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy