AMD Radeon R9 290 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290
4.849 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+220%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
40
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
4096
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
275W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Hawaii PRO
(215-0852020)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
22 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
