Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +4562%
4.849 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
40
Compute Units
2
2560
Shading Units
80
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cedar
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
19W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy