AMD Radeon R9 290X vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (290W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X
5.632 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+336%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
8192
176
TMUs
512
64
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
290W
TDP
450W
600 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
Hawaii XT
(215-0852000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
22 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5
