Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Boost Clock888MHz
Lower TDP (130W vs 290W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X +175%
5.632 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
2.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
888 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1152
176
TMUs
96
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS

Board Design

290W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GK104
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy