Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 290W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2004
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
12
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
NV41
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

290W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy