Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +13309%
5.632 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Jun 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
40
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

580W
TDP
20W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV610
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy