Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 345.6GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +41%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Mar 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
176
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
300W
950 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Capsaicin
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy