Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +107%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Sep 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1600
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
250W
950 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cypress
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy