Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD FirePro W2100

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Boost Clock680MHz
Lower TDP (26W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +1194%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
320
176
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
26W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Oland
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy