Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI FireGL V5600

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI FireGL V5600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
2696 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +2885%
5.733 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
120
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
89W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
RV630
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy